Tuesday, May 30, 2006

Anti-McMansion Rules Shot Down In Westfield

From the Suburban News:

Rough reception for new development rules
By ANNA BOGDANOWICZ

"After hearing overwhelming opposition from local residents, including numerous members of the real estate industry, the Planning Board last week unanimously recommended that the Town Council not move forward with a proposed ordinance designed to curb overdevelopment."

"At a special meeting on May 18, the board also recommended that the council establish a special committee including local officials, residents and professionals with expertise in the area to further research the issue."

"Though the spread of "McMansions" has been a hot topic in town for years, the residents who attended last week's meeting said emphatically that the draft ordinance, which included changes to floor-area ratio (FAR), height and accessory structures, was a step in the wrong direction."

"About 50 residents came to the meeting, including local architects and planners who said the proposed changes would adversely affect everything from homeowners' rights to property taxes and building design."

"Some residents argued it was unfair to criticize new construction when there are many large older homes in the community that could be considered McMansions. And others said Foerst's committee had not adequately defined the issue it was trying to address."

14 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

So long to the quaint, architecturally consistent neighborhoods and historical charm that was the main attraction to living there in the first place. Those city planners are unbelivably clueless.

5/30/2006 08:51:00 AM  
Blogger chicagofinance said...

Off-Topic:

Please note, we have discussed this issue in the past....

Cheap Foreign Capital
Harks Back to '90s Crisis

Some Economists Warn
Of Risk-Reward Imbalance
In Developing Countries
By MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS
May 30, 2006; Page A2

WASHINGTON -- Developing nations are growing increasingly dependent on cheap foreign capital, a situation that some economists warn is reminiscent of the lead-up to the financial meltdown of the late 1990s.

In a report to be released today, the World Bank calculates that private investors plowed a record $491 billion into developing-country stocks, bonds, factories and other assets last year, up from $397 billion the previous year. At the same time, investors appear, in some economists' views, to be making those purchases without adequately assessing just how risky the assets are.

While foreign capital can help finance investments that make poor countries richer, the worst-case scenario is that a sudden shock -- anything from a major outbreak of bird flu to a slowdown in China to an unexpected rise in U.S. interest rates -- could spook investors who suddenly decide the low returns on developing-world assets simply aren't worth the risk. Such a pullback could leave developing nations with big debts at the same time they would face economies slowed by rising interest rates, falling stock prices and tumbling demand for their exports.

[edit]

An indicator of how eager U.S. and other foreign investors are to buy emerging-market assets is the record-low yields they demand for their money. J.P. Morgan calculates the difference between the return on a typical developing-world government bond and a comparable U.S. government security, a measure called the yield spread. A high spread indicates that investors consider emerging markets very risky.

[edit]

"Over the past couple of years, there has been no valuation for the risk in emerging markets," says Kristin Forbes, an economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a former adviser to President Bush.

[edit]

5/30/2006 08:53:00 AM  
Blogger grim said...

If you don't own it, don't fall in love with it. That applies equally as well to neighborhoods, existing structures, open spaces, and even views.

grim

5/30/2006 08:54:00 AM  
Blogger grim said...

It's all about consumerism and conspicuous consumption.

The value of a person is only in the things he or she owns, most importantly, those things that they can display, obviously, to others.

What do you get when you combine this with increasing debt, easy credit, and a negative savings rate?

5/30/2006 11:20:00 AM  
Blogger grim said...

Or in the case of the niche towns, it is invidious over conspicuous.

5/30/2006 11:21:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"it seems you can't live in a nice town with great schools without living amongst the arrogant schmucks."


While a bit long, that would make for a great bumper sticker!

People would be rolling at the stoplights, even the arrogant schmucks!

5/30/2006 12:25:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What's with all the Westfield bashing? How can you be surprised or upset about the McMansions in a town whose town-center features a Gap, Victorias Secret, Banana Repulic, Panera, Express, etc. Westfield is a nice town, and its values are very obvious. If you don't enjoy those values, then its not the town for you. I lived there, and then moved on.

5/30/2006 01:14:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

And one good thing about Westfield, they're the only Trader Joe's between MA and VA that sells wine!

5/30/2006 03:13:00 PM  
Blogger chicagofinance said...

"Seems to me that many (though not all) people who are against McMansions are those who couldn't afford to buy in their town today and who resent the influx of new wealth."

Skep:
I completely disagree. They are an embarassing display of american exhibitionism. Thoughtless waste in a narcissistic wrapper. Further, I can't even understand how an owner would enjoy living in one. It has to be the ultimate in "gotta have it" only to be followed with "G-d I don't need this".

5/30/2006 04:15:00 PM  
Blogger grim said...

If I had an extra two million lying around, the last thing I'd do with it was buy real estate.

CF, that is one of the best descriptions I've read yet.

grim

5/30/2006 04:49:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

People in general in the US especially major metro areas have an issue with flaunting "fake wealth". I just don't get it, it can't be a from around here thing.

I grew up here, my parents grew up here, and their parents grew up here. My parents also have done very well and have money along with 3 homes in nice areas summer(Cape May), winter(Palm Beach, FL), and NNJ(Bergen). But even given some of the nicer things they own they refuse to buy all the labels, waste money on extravagent things, have any personal debt. They even make fun of me for buying food at whole foods and buying expensive food.

This is what I don't get what happened to grounded regular people. Even though my family has money they always made me work, never gave me extravagant things, paid for college and said go make it on your own. I guess if people taught their children the meaning of a dollar and a hard days work, people wouldn't spend so much.

5/30/2006 04:50:00 PM  
Blogger grim said...

Both you, and your family, are a rare breed.

Have you ever read "The Millionaire Next Door"?

grim

5/30/2006 05:06:00 PM  
Blogger chicagofinance said...

Consumerism is the new religion.

People are leading empty lives and they need "stuff" around them in a desperate attempt to fill the void. Maybe investing [time & effort] in family and spirituality [in whatever palatable form] would help.

Naaahhh. That would take too much commitment and self-sacrifice. Instant gratification is where it's at............give the kids ice cream and coca-cola and plop them in front of the kids' TV so you can enjoy the Plasma TV in your home theater.

5/30/2006 09:13:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Looks nice! Awesome content. Good job guys.
»

6/09/2006 02:19:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home