Wednesday, June 28, 2006

Tell Them How Much You Would Pay

I've received a number of emails lately, which all asked the same question. If people are boycotting open houses, and not placing bids, how are sellers supposed to know that their homes are overpriced? It's a good question. Unless the sign in sheets are blank, and their home has been on the market a long time, they probably don't. Very few people in New Jersey are keeping as close a watch on the market as we are, agents included.

So here is what we're going to do. I want you all to go out to realtor.com and find a listing or two that fits what you might be looking for. Once you find it, paste the link up as a reply, along with the price that you would seriously consider buying it for. You can post anonymously if you wish. This is a serious exercise, please don't post a link to a $4.5m home with a bid of $10.50.

Here is an example, chosen at random:


The property is in Essex Fells, NJ.

Essex Fells MLS ID#: 2236020

The current asking price is $819,900, a reduction from an OLP of $849,900. This home has been on the market approximately 6 months.



Barring any problems with the home inspection, I would purchase this property at $650,000.

I'll be posting my selections up later in the day, anonymously. However, if this home was in my price range, and what I was looking for, I would most certainly purchase the home at that price, barring any issues with the home inspection, of course.

Caveat Emptor!
Grim

94 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Okay, here's a sample: MLS# 10068181

It's tatty, on the bay, and cheek-to-jowl with other, similar shacks. Owner wants $550k. I want to win Wimbledon. We both are equally far from our dream...

I would enter discussions at $259k. This sort of property is a case of a rising tide not lifting the boats that are anchored by a short chain.

Another:

MLS# 3002172. Asking $850k. I'd open in the low threes. Owner has got to be kidding.

MLS# 3005059. Asking $629k. I'd open in the low threes for this, also. To paraphrase William "Doubling Down is a Virtue" Bennett, "where is the value?"

Maybe I'm deluded, and these are properties that the owners can hang onto long enough to weather the storm (praying, of course, that Al Gore is wrong about all that rising ocean level stuff...). But properties at the lower end of the spectrum seem due for the biggest correction.

Homes listed for roughly 50% more than the dump for $850k--$1.2 million--just seem to offer so much more "value," everything being relative. I'd expect those pricier, more liveable units to slide only about 1/3 to 2/5 in value--back into the sevens or eights. But then, maybe I'm the crazy one.

Jamey from Bergen

6/28/2006 07:28:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If the market corrections is 25-30%,
when ,if at all, do you see a return to nrmal appreciation (5-6%/year)?

6/28/2006 08:04:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here is one that I have been looking at:

MLS# 2275550

http://www.realtor.com/Prop/1059682326

Original Asking Price: $679,500 (early May), reduced to $668,000 (May 26th +/-). If memory serves it last sold in ’99 for $260,000, it seems that they renovated the kitchen, during their time in the house (maybe $50k cost). I just cannot get over the idea of over $600k and only 1.5 baths.

Maybe I would be interested in talking at $465k.

6/28/2006 08:09:00 AM  
Blogger grim said...

There is no such thing as "normal appreciation".

grim

6/28/2006 08:42:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

First: Silly question: How do you ascertain a property's OLP, whether its been reduced, and its reduced price? I don't see that information provided on Realtor.com, nor on NJMLS or GSMLS. Any help?

Second: anonymous 09:04:43 AM wrote: "when ,if at all, do you see a return to nrmal appreciation (5-6%/year)?

Actually, historically "normal" appreciation is about 1-3% per year. I guess the overheated market has obscured that fact.

6/28/2006 08:46:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"richard: Never ever ever buy a house on a busy street, no matter how "cheap" you get it for. Location will return as paramount to house values, and a busy street will also seriouly impact your quality of life. Don't do it."

IMHO, it's really unrealistic to impose bright line rules like this.

Suppose the busy street address is the only home within someone's price range in a nice town with great schools?

In other words, I'd rather live on a busy street in a nice town with great schools, than a quiet street in a so-so town with so-so schools.

Of course, in some cases driveway access is a nightmare, such as busy streets near a bend in the road. But I would by no means rule out busy street addresses in general.

JDP

6/28/2006 08:53:00 AM  
Blogger grim said...

illy question: How do you ascertain a property's OLP, whether its been reduced, and its reduced price? I don't see that information provided on Realtor.com, nor on NJMLS or GSMLS. Any help?

Hard way: Track the property, over time, using gsmls, njmls, or realtor.com

Easy way: Make friends with an agent that has access to the gsmls or njmls systems.

There are many 'friends' on this blog that would be happy to provide you with that information.

grim

6/28/2006 08:53:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Another angle on this discussion:

http://www.realtor.com/Prop/1062826624

A rental (2 fam) in Summit where the rent roll is less than the mortgage (not even including taxes and insurance). As an investment why would anyone one do this with home prices not appreciating. That is not retorical I really would like to know. Check out this listing an look at what the description says "Just buy and start collecting $$$ on this truly turnkey home!!!"

Does this make any sense?????

What is a vaild price for a return on this investment with this cash flow?




Moonshine

6/28/2006 08:55:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

richard: Never ever ever buy a house on a busy street, no matter how "cheap" you get it for. Location will return as paramount to house values, and a busy street will also seriouly impact your quality of life. Don't do it."

I agree that you shouldn't assume your standards for quality of life apply to everyone.

We have no children and don't plan to have any.

There is less likelihood that we will be surrounded by children and all the noisy accoutrements (basketball hoops, trampolines, etc.) on a busier street as opposed to a cul-de-sac.

As long as we have a decent backyard and can turn around to drive out of the driveway nose first, we'll be happy. Plus, we'll pay less than on the quiet street.

"Busy" can mean different things to different people.

6/28/2006 09:14:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I use a loose calculation to approximate the potential offer price on a prospective house.

Understanding that Im selling my house for an appreciated price I attempt to calculate the 'funny money' in my own house then apply it to an adjusted cv price on the prospective property.

I do this by calculating my houses current 'uninflated' value by applying cpi/cv calculations to my original purchase price (purchased in 1998). I subtract that from what I sold my house for, giving me my 'funny money' or 'over-appreciation'.

Then I attempt to normalize the prospective houses cv price based upon tax records for that particular house and other comparable houses in that neighborhood. If the tax records indicate a sale during the years where we already entered the bubble runnup (2000-2005) I try to discount it back to 1998. Then apply cpi values to the 1998 price giving me an inflation adjusted housing price.

Then I take the 'funny money' that Ive made on my own house and apply it to the inflation adjusted price on the prospective house, giving me a current adjusted value (with funny money adjustment). Interestingly enough the current list prices on houses tend to be significantly off from my inflation adjusted price for the house (with added funny money).

I also recently started reading material by Harry S Dent (www.hsdent.com). His books give an interesting perspective on this housing boom (as well as the economy in general) and some interesting predictions on where its all going. He basically analyzes the market using demographic trends, specifically the baby boomers. He boils things down to statistics (what is the average age people move into their biggest house) and the fundamental laws of supply and demand. Very interesting read.

The hardest part of buying a home in this market is determining what is a fair price for the house. This approach gives me some starting point and it puts my mind at ease.

I really enjoy this blog. It provides me with the intentistinal fortitude to walk away from a deal if I feel like the sellers are being irrational.

6/28/2006 09:15:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"We have no children and don't plan to have any."

Even if you decide to have kids, the busy street aspect is a non-issue if you have a back yard large enough to serve as a play area and you install a sturdy fence.

And yes, the irony is that busy streets are often quieter than quiet streets for the reasons you cite!

JDP

6/28/2006 09:22:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have several properties in mind BUT the continued access to easy credit has me really worried. I might put a value on a house today but may not stick with it tomorrow. By trying to tie a value to a property I feel like I’m trying to catch a falling knife.

What do you feel? The only economics i know of is from reading articles on the internet.

What is the future of 'easy credit'? Is it here to stay? Will interest rates continue to be low the near future? (Greenspan said that a few years back)

I’m confused

6/28/2006 09:23:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

My contention is that prices will revert to the mean increase - like they always do. In NJ, that means about a 25-35% correction. That means I don't buy for anything over 65% of a "reasonable" list today.

6/28/2006 09:32:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.realtor.com/Prop/1056959742

2259753, this is a new house in bridgewater. They have three similar houses like this. They want 689k. I would buy it at once if it's 530k. But I think I'm dreaming. I would never buy a house with a price like that.

--frustrated sitter

6/28/2006 09:32:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://homepics.realtor.com/image9/http/gardenstate/submit/large/037/2259755a.jpg

6/28/2006 09:38:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Grim: I love this idea..

I emailed you before for this listing. I would seriously consider buying if it goes for below 600K. I will definitely buy it if it is 550K.

2282725

6/28/2006 09:47:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Seeing big price reductions in less desirable areas first, the better ones will follow.

Also, the market is dead in towns like River Edge, partly because their taxes are innane. Yes, I said innane

6/28/2006 09:52:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Delford,

No one is saying your sister didn't have a miserable experience. But not all main road addresses are equally insufferable. You have to take into account set backs from the road, as well as the intensity of traffic on the busy street. At a house right on top of a busy street, of course noise is an issue. But if it's set back far enough, noise isn't as big an issue.

Also, some roads are less busy on weekends, when most people are doing their entertaining.

Also, consider topography. If the property slopes up above the road, the road noise will definitely be less.

As far as pollution goes, I've lived on both a main road and side streets, and never noticed any extra soot on the main road. But maybe that's because the home I selected was set back a reasonable distance.

JDP

6/28/2006 09:59:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How about this 2 br townhouse in Branchburg?
Current list 328,900 under MLS 2255963.
Originally listed (under different MLS back in Sept. 2005) for 339,900.
Current tax assessment 222,300.
Originally purchased 11/30/94 for 127,000.
Would offer 235,000.

6/28/2006 10:02:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

MLS ID#: 10088270
$699,000
4 Bed, 1.5 Bath

I'd pay $425k- place needs work-updating.

6/28/2006 10:05:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Frustrated sitter:

You might get it at the price you want before you know it. But I am afraid at that time, you feel the price you are more than willing to offer today is too high for the house then..

Offering 500K for a nice BW property is not that unrealistic, considering what houses priced for about 7,8 years ago.. BW is also not a top tier town, have you been to the Vandeveer section? I would not want to live there, the houses are asking for 600K+.. Although recently some "moltivated seller" started to ask for 580k+...

Houses in these good towns are dropping 20K-50K per every three months now... It will accelerate in no time.. I can't wait to see this..

That means I am earning 20K-50K every three months, and going for more in the coming months, how exciting......

6/28/2006 10:08:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

With the difference between list prices and the prices people who responded said they would pay, it looks like nobody's gonna get a house today. But I have a question. If for some reason, any reason, house prices went down across the board, say 12%in the next two months, would you still be willing to pay the price you just stated, or would you reassess your view of where prices are going to be,long term, and come up with a lower number. Or alternately, would your number be the same, with you being pleased that your goal is looking more attainable. (This is an honest question that I think it would be interesting to have some feedback on.)

6/28/2006 10:19:00 AM  
Blogger grim said...

We were driving through Montclair last Sunday and stopped into this open house on Valley:

MLS# 2287572

Issues..
Corner Property
Oil Heat
On Valley Road
Needs Updating (Why did yo put granite countertops on top of cheap 80's cabinetry?)

I *might* be interested at about the 425-450k range. Although, to tell you the truth, even at that price it would seem a bit overpriced, given the location, property type, and work required.

grim

6/28/2006 10:23:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Anon. at 11:19am:

I have a bench mark price for houses, that was how much they sold for in 1998.

I will add 3-5% appreciation to these houses and get my right price for the right house. I don't really care how fast or slow they drop, that is the price I am willing to pay.

Once house price hit my range, that is when I will put in offers.

What would you do?

6/28/2006 10:25:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

REINVESTOR...PAGING REINVESTOR

Your input would be appreciated in this thread

Do you think bubbleheads are being unreasonable?

6/28/2006 10:25:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

frustrated sitter,

I drove by all 3 of those new houses - they're on a nice quiet street that has mostly older smaller houses. These houses don't really "fit in" there.

If they went down to $450, I'd be interested.

SMK

6/28/2006 10:39:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm against busy street home locations. Yesterday in Sayreville a dumb dumb drove his car off the road through a homes fence into their backyard and the two front tires landed in the family's swimming pool.

Plus the loud motorcycles that don't ever seem to have mufflers on them and all the other loud veheicles driven fast and loud by all the insane drivers we have in this state. It's not worth it. You may be giving up your sanity.

6/28/2006 10:42:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is a great community service, Grim. You could maybe cut/paste the link to this by e-mail out to the main contact us page on some realtor sites. We'd get some real discussion going. I guarantee!

If we had to move back to NJ from PA, here's the area.

Here are two:

http://tinyurl.com/s8mov
Asking $515; I'd offer $450 to put a good amount down. Well water/septic. Probably not get it. Don't really like this house, but friends are there and could commute together/kid sitting/etc.

www.realtor.com/Prop/1058571912
Listed at $490. I'd offer $425.
This house reminds me of my childhood home. That's the only reason I picked it. I really can't stand the traffic there.

Pat

6/28/2006 10:42:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hoboken Property.

http://realtor.com/Prop/1057018394

I'd go $375K-380K

6/28/2006 10:59:00 AM  
Blogger grim said...

Pat,

Both of those offers are extremely realistic. I know people putting in offers very similar to that today.

That said, $450 on the first seems a bit on the high side to me. Mainly due to the location, the location is very far from friends/family/job..

grim

6/28/2006 11:00:00 AM  
Blogger grim said...

The bid on the Hoboken property seems very realistic as well.

Seems like many of you don't share the same "grim" outlook as I do.

Going by my own personal rule of thumb, that Hoboken property would need to rent for around $2,500 a month to be a 'good deal' at 375/380k.

grim

6/28/2006 11:03:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The following big 2 bedroom (1300 sq foot) Hoboken condo (walking distance from Path but no parking) is listed at $495,000 (http://hudson.fnismls.com/publink/default.asp?GUID=a1f047f2-f172-47a1-8b2a-349f9158e6d3&Report=Yes). It would rent for $2800 easily. I was thinking that $425000 would be a fair price but it appears that the owner paid $455000 for it back in the summer of 2004 so my guess is that my offer would be unceremoniously (sp?) dismissed.

6/28/2006 11:20:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I look at it differently.. We bought our house based on 20% less then 2005 prices and we also looked at the comps for similar houses to see what people payed at the beginning of the boom. We averaged the two.. That is basically what we offered. We loved the house and needed to move.

6/28/2006 11:43:00 AM  
Blogger chicagofinance said...

chicago's off-topic Hoboken dime-store diatribe 6/28/06

The Hoboken condo market is primed for a serious tuchus-kicking. If you buy anytime before mid-2007 you are a fool.

If you want to buy a brownstone or some other 3BR+ solution that would represent a level of permanence, fine. Otherwise, what are you doing?

There is already serious depreciation in prices that is being hidden by developers in the form of free upgrades, givebacks at closing, and cut-rate financing.

The flow of inventory is not going to stop from new and existing development for at least 3 years.

Rent. Rent. Rent. And if renting doesn't seem to fit the bill, then maybe you should consider renting.

6/28/2006 12:07:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How do you find out what current or previous owners paid for the property?

6/28/2006 12:12:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

zillow.com.. will give you previous sales price

6/28/2006 12:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon 11:05 Point Pleasant -
If we help you install a new kitchen you'll let us have the house the 2nd week of July for the next three years, right?

Alright..I'll dig out the nasty hedges and install windowboxes, too.

Pat

6/28/2006 12:18:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

2614240

Think this one started in the 8's is now down to 649K.. All redone.. very nice on the inside.. Would pay 585K

6/28/2006 12:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon 1:26..do it or I will (if only I could.)

If you go up in the attic, between the doormers, are there any small cubby doors that let you crawl under the eaves between dormers?

Too bad all the woodwork was painted. It still looks nice, but imagine it with a shiny chestnut old wood look on the newel post.

Pat

6/28/2006 12:34:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If the market corrections is 25-30%,
when ,if at all, do you see a return to nrmal appreciation (5-6%/year)?


Looking at past boom and bust cycles, 4 to 5 years is the norm.

6/28/2006 12:35:00 PM  
Blogger Paul said...

Re Zillow,

I find it useless in the Maplewood area. Nothing helpful there at all, no data on past sales.

6/28/2006 12:35:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We're nearing the end of June, and the realtor who always posts sales from the previous month, is seriously behind schedule with the May numbers...

Wonder why? :)

6/28/2006 12:36:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

MLS 2289888
OLP 699,000
Current List 649,000
Would seriously consider for 500,000 - 525,000.

House is in a nice neighborhood (drexel hill), but taxes are over 750/mo, the house has an unfinished basement, 1 car garage and a fairly steep sloping backyard. Plus, Clark doesn't have much to offer other than above average schools. The center of town is below average and residents pay extra for barbage, water and sewer on top of already high property taxes.

6/28/2006 12:38:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"why is Corner Property bad?"


Less privacy, surrounded by traffic on two sides.

That said, take a look at this property, which is surrounded by streets on all four sides:

http://tinyurl.com/kossd

It's not for sale, but it's such a bizarre location.

6/28/2006 12:41:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pat,

I only have one pretty big issue and that is way I haven't really moved on it.. If you have ever been to Harrington Park.. There is a frieght line that goes through there.. Noisy as all get out.. The realtor told me its part of the towns charm..Its a couple of blocks away from it but still too close for me.. I have been meaning to get up around 4 am (there is a 5am train that goes through there that you can hear in Rivervale) Just to see how loud it is.. But I am just not motivated lately.. It could be that is the summer and I am more interested in a cold beer.

6/28/2006 12:42:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Actually, historically "normal" appreciation is about 1-3% per year. I guess the overheated market has obscured that fact.

I believe it is 1-3% over inflation rate, so 5-6% makes sense.

6/28/2006 12:46:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why is Corner Property bad ?

I think it's a matter of personal preference.

I was raised in a corner property house without a fence or hedges, and it was like living in a fishbowl. Plus, you have all that extra sidewalk to shovel when it snows.

It would have to be a pretty special place to make me want to buy a corner property.

jw

6/28/2006 12:47:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Definitely happens in the summer.

The train doesn't bother me.. my Dad worked for the railroad for 35 years, so I'm used to it. But if you're not, it's annoying instead of comforting.

Pat

6/28/2006 12:47:00 PM  
Blogger Paul said...

How 'bout these, in Maplewood?

MLS#: 2288809
Listed at $359,000

MLS #: 2273031
Listed at $415,000 (down from $425,000). It has two large brs, but the third is barely a nursery, on the south Side of Springfield.

MLS Number: 2290900
Listed at $389,000.

None of these are on the $1mm side, but they seem overvalued just the same.

What would you consider fair pricing for these?

Anyone with access to history, that could shed some light, please do.

6/28/2006 12:50:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

see your point .. I grew up in absolute quiet.. I lived on a major rd in JC for 4 years never could fall asleep..I got the impression they put it on for 649K hoping for a bidding war..

6/28/2006 12:52:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob is enjoying a margarita.

Remember -

NO MAAS!!! No Bids!!!

Boycott Houses!!

Bob

6/28/2006 01:07:00 PM  
Blogger chicagofinance said...

Robertito está gozando de un margarita.

Recuerde - ¡NINGÚN MAAS!!!

Ningunas Ofertas!!! ¡Casas Del Boicoteo!!

Bob

6/28/2006 01:14:00 PM  
Blogger chicagofinance said...

debe boicotear los hosues disponibles para la venta

6/28/2006 01:17:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Never ever ever buy a house on a busy street, no matter how "cheap" you get it for. Location will return as paramount to house values, and a busy street will also seriouly impact your quality of life. Don't do it."

It depends on your priorities, lifestyle and the specifics of the property. A majority of old, historic and interesting houses can be found on primary roads.

I lived in a beautiful 100 year old house on a busy street for many years, purchased at a steep discount due to the main road. The property was very deep, and the house was set way back. You could only hear road noise from the front yard, but not from inside the house or in the back by the swimming pool.

I would not have bought it if it was closer to the road and noise intruded into the house.

Another thing to consider is that houses on busy roads are typically not part of a social neighborhood as nobody wants to hang out near the noise in the front yard of their homes. Of course this might be a plus depending on your point of view.

And finally, houses on primary roads are much more difficult to sell when the time comes since they are undesirable to a large segment of the market (particularly people with kids), and must be substantially discounted especially in a slow market.

6/28/2006 01:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This posting today from the Westchester RE Blog :
westchesterny.blogspot.com
>>
As a real estate agent, I recommend you buy now. Don't be influenced by the media with this bubble talk. This is a great time to buy as sellers are starting to reduce prices.

Prices will start going up in the fall.
<<
Our RE friend thinks there is going to be a fall bounce...

6/28/2006 01:20:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No compro ninguno..

hmmm...2614240.

6/28/2006 01:20:00 PM  
Blogger Paul said...

Chicago, laying down the bilingual skills.

Muy impressive, senor.

6/28/2006 01:25:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Heres a link for helpful conversion factor tables in pdf format.

http://oregonstate.edu/
Dept/pol_sci/fac/sahr/
sahr.htm#_Conversion_
Factor_Tables

These tables provide a way of calculating inflation adjusted numbers in 2006 dollars. All you have to do is divide the number (say 1998 home price) by the conversion factor for that year (1998=0.835 if using the 2005 chart) and it will give you the inflation adjusted price of the 400k house.

So say someone bought a house for 400k in 1998. The inflation adjusted price would be 400/0.835 or 479k.

6/28/2006 01:40:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

When I sold real estate back in the early 90's, homes on busy streets sat for up to two years, one in particular was on Norman/Valley in Upper Montclair. This was a time when things were "normal."

Good luck with your purchase ;-)

6/28/2006 01:48:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

is Grim ghost and grim the same person?

6/28/2006 02:01:00 PM  
Blogger grim said...

no

6/28/2006 02:04:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

house refinancing -
you're spamming the wrong blog. people around here are not idiots.

JS

6/28/2006 02:05:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

sorry grim
didn't know you were going to delete it. you can delete mine too.

JS

6/28/2006 02:07:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

384185

This one is my current dream home.. Its in the park .. I love it there its isolated and you can fish all day

6/28/2006 02:09:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

grim -
this exercise helps a lot. I certainly didn't want to be stupid and bite off more than I can chew. affordability aside, we're interested in houses in the 500k range but since we only want to spend 350k max, we're only looking at 400k houses and just see if they come down a bit. but we would definitely be settling then.
it's reassuring to know other people here are also wanting houses that are 100-200k more than they're willing to spend.
good luck everyone. hope you get the house of your dreams - soon!!

MJ

6/28/2006 02:17:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

usually how much longer a listing will show in GSMLS once it goes into attorney review?

6/28/2006 02:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No habla

6/28/2006 02:23:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"usually how much longer a listing will show in GSMLS once it goes into attorney review?"


Sometimes a few days, sometimes for many weeks until the day it closes.

6/28/2006 02:28:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Grim ghost, beat me by 4 seconds. :)

6/28/2006 02:29:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To clarify, sometimes a seller will continue to list the property, until the day it closes. Such a practice is probably designed to keep pressure on the buyer in contract.

In those cases, the property will be listed as in "attorney review" for up to several months, until the day it closes.

6/28/2006 02:31:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

O.K, Grim.

You got the low-down on what people want and can afford or are willing to pay.

Now, let's get some of the listing agents to show up here with comps from the last two months, and justify NOT selling the houses for the offers/amounts listed here. NO comps accepted older than 5/01.

Pat

6/28/2006 02:41:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon 3:09.. That is a nice one, but I think it's overpriced. I hope they can save the park.

Don't you have to drive down a ways to get on 17 or the Thruway from that house?

Besides, that road is so full of deer you could get killed!

Pat

6/28/2006 02:51:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No its not that bad.. Once you leave the Gate of Tuxedo Park your in the town I would say that its the last exit before the thruway toll and the gate is about 15 min from the Thruway.. Its a one way rd to the gate which is a pain .. Our friends live there and we love it .. Though not good for kids the Public school is not that great and the Private school in the park is 20K per year..

6/28/2006 03:04:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

In repsonse to TP I wouls probably pay 650K for it

6/28/2006 03:04:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Shailesh
The prices will come down faster this time because of 2 important factors:
#1
Buyers and Sellers are much more tuned in to each other's viewpoints due to the proliferation of Housing info on the internet. Take this blog for example. We no longer have to depend on what the RE agent has to say, everyone can do their own independent research and come to a conclusion of what constitues a fair price in the market.

#2
The coming waves of foreclosure due to resetting of ARMs. It has already started in states such as Massachusetts and Colorado. NJ is not far. This event will accelerate the downturn much faster. The bubble is much bigger than what it was in the late 80s.

6/28/2006 03:07:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

hi guys,
i'd appreciate any feedback...

will be relocating to nj next year (renting in ca right now).
are townhouses in nj generally cheaper or more expensive than sfh?after maintenance fees, etc. do they come out the same? the concern i have is it seems houses in nj are mostly built in the 1950's or older. the only new ones seem to be townhouses.

thanks!
VA

6/28/2006 03:44:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

VA - when you check the listings, watch for townhouses that say "no association fee."

Per square foot, I've found townhomes generally to be cheaper, but it is not always the case if they are not in the same school district..even if they are only a mile apart. I think schools are really a swing factor here (like taxes). Really impacts the value of a home.

You need to decide how far you want to commute, then go to realtor.com or various sites like c21.com, and put in the zips.

You can call the listing agent for the total association dues, maintenance fee, and a list of pending expenses, such as for a new roof, that the association has recently voted in.

6/28/2006 03:55:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

hejiranyc, that's like telling the seller to pay a listing agent a fee to correctly price the house, but then to drop that price to reality.

In a negotiation, it won't work because most buyers don't see this blog, and therefore the seller still has secrecy (referred to as "OLD" comps) on seller's side in the negotiation.

Until all data is known (as in a totally transparent market like for a commodity) then one party to the negotiation will always try to use undisclosed facts to his/her advantage.

6/28/2006 04:10:00 PM  
Blogger Paul said...

hejiranyc has the start of a good idea.

Perhaps, Grim, you can great folder for this type of thing at the forum. Post a listing, and let the discussion flow below it regarding the correct, reasonable price.

6/28/2006 04:11:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Worthy of a re-post:

They [realtors] speak of being "skunked" at open houses, meaning, no one showed up, even after the sellers made "price improvements. I've learned to bring a good book with me," says agent Christopher Rotondo, as he sits alone at an open house in Newport, Rhode Island.

http://thehousingbubbleblog.com/?p=960


Where's Bob?

There's nothing like a 'skunked' realtor to brighten my day!

6/28/2006 04:12:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I was going to place a bid for $375K on this place listed at $395K

http://realtor.com/Prop/1056910978

The place is on the top floor of a 4 story walk up and is near 1st Ave and Adams. Large bathroom to boot.

What is everyones impression of this place and what would they bid?

6/28/2006 04:45:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh yeah.....the above $395K is in Hoboken. Sorry.

6/28/2006 04:46:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sorry, anon..I'd do as njgal (?) said and drink warm bleach before I'd pay $395K plus taxes for 789 square feet on the 4th floor.

I guess I'm just used lower prices.

Pat

6/28/2006 04:49:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anon 4:07 pm is dead on! regarding the timing/acceleration of prices reverting to the mean (after of course their overshoot to below the mean) Leverage does not put time on the side of most dummy's who over-payed with OPM in the 01' to 06' period.
ps: stupid is as stupid does; the real upside down builder types will go to foreclosure, vs. what a real sale will bring...and via the foreclosure (taken from them) process they will get even less, every RE cycle has proven this.

6/28/2006 05:24:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You know what kills me, ok that is a NICE house. But little 14 foot wide 1/2 duplex/townhomes in Fort Lee are going for 600K

At least with a wooded lot and some pace between my neighbor and I I would feel some of that 800K is worth it.

6/28/2006 05:32:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Chicago,

A follow up to your comment on buying in Hoboken. If you were to guesstimate, when do you think will be the right time? My husband and I have put off buying a couple of times and now we are facing the need to move out of our crowded upper east apartment and rent something larger or buy at the end of the year. I'm fine with renting since it appears the market will still be in flux but I hate to go out and rent only to find the right time to buy is a year later. Hate moving!

Thanks for your thoughts.

JD

6/28/2006 06:33:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anyone familiar with the Monroe and South Brunswick, NJ markets?

Grim-

Could you please help me out?

6/28/2006 07:48:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

MLS ID#: 2277236 lake mohawk
good location no dishwasher in new kitchen bathrooms are dated and work in kitchen and basement not finished. also not lake style and no centeral air listed at 399,000 id pay 310,000

6/28/2006 09:11:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

My wife went to look at
MLS ID#: 2241647
new construction in Whippany. 5 BR/3.5 Ba/3Car
Now asking $774,900 (was in the 8's)
Just one ... no ... two minor problems:
1. Stone throw from I287
2. Train tracks 50ft from the back door

What was this builder thinking??

6/28/2006 09:48:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon 8:48

What're you lookin for?

I work there, and also work with a former real estate agent from Milltown who is extremely honest (reminds me of Ms. Klaus)

If you need specific info, like on a town, let me know.

Pat

6/28/2006 09:49:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon 8:48

What're you lookin for?

I work there, and also work with a former real estate agent from Milltown who is extremely honest (reminds me of Ms. Klaus)

If you need specific info, like on a town, let me know.

Pat

6/28/2006 09:49:00 PM  
Blogger Roadtripboy said...

This thread grew fast! Here's a 1 bedroom coop in Rutherford whose asking price is $129K. Here's the MLS ID# at Realtor.com: 2618440.

What would I pay? $71,195. How did I arrive at that price? With a little help from this New York Times article, written in 2001: http://www.rutherford-nj.com/nytimes.asp

I feel I was very generous person and used the higher of the two prices ($55K) and then gave the owner %5 appreciation per year from 2001 through 2006.

The 2-bedroom units in this complex are even more over priced. They are currently asking $250K but they went for 65-70K back in 2001 according to the article.

6/28/2006 11:07:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Skeptic- I agree, the prices people are willing to pay seem high in many cases. Sellers would be crazy to not take those offers in an instant.

I guess I think the market's going to fall much farther than most.

But it really is a shame, if some of you would feel okay paying that much money for these properties, that sellers don't get a clue and reduce to get the market moving.

I'm sure a lot of those sellers would be making a handsome profit even at the prices suggested here.

Never knew I was such a bear compared to most!

Are you all taking higher interest rates into account?

6/29/2006 12:22:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There are townhomes in Edison -Middlesex , West Gate and one on Talmadge Road.

Priced at 370 K - 420 K.

I won't pay more than 300 K.

6/29/2006 12:43:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home