Thursday, March 23, 2006

Don't Get Too Excited Over Existing Home Sales

The National Association of Realtors released their existing home sales report for Febuary to much fanfare this morning.

February EHS (PDF)

While starts came in above analyst expectations, they were down 0.3% year over year (6.93 in Feb '05 versus 6.91 in Feb '06). So, after 6 months of decline which included significant drops in December and January, sales tick up.


There didn't seem to be much fanfare over the declines in median prices..

Peak Pricing versus Feb '06
United States
Aug 2005 - $220,000
Feb 2006 - $209,000 (5% decline)

Northeast (Set a record)
Feb 2006 - $263,000

Midwest
Aug 2005 - $189,000
Feb 2006 - $182,000 (3.7% decline)

South
Aug 2005 - $189,000
Feb 2006 - $182,000 (3.7% decline)

West
Nov 2005 - $332,000
Feb 2006 - $306,000 (7.8% decline)

(Declines are over the time period, not annualized)

Also of note is the fact that inventory is up to 5.3 months supply. Actual inventory has increased over 30% year over year.

Sales in the Northeast (unadjusted)
Febuary '05 - 68,000
January '06 - 58,000
Feburary '06 - 70,000

Let me note that these sales volumes do not reflect what we saw in Northern NJ over the same time period. Sales in Northern NJ (GSMLS only) declined approximately 18% in February (1705 to 1395).

Caveat Emptor!
Grim

27 Comments:

Anonymous Rich In NorthNJ said...

But that bump was enough for Wall Street to change their predictions toward more rate increases in the future. Recently they believed the March 28 meeting would be the last or next to last increase.
I know the Fed says they don't take on equity Bubbles, that they only clean up afterward. But I believe that they are actually trying to put downward pressure on the housing market.

March's results should be very intesting!

3/23/2006 11:36:00 AM  
Anonymous Rich In NorthNJ said...

I meant Interesting!

3/23/2006 11:37:00 AM  
Blogger grim said...

10Y yields made a big jump up this morning..

I really don't believe the jump was due to the initial claims numbers..

Chicago?

grim

3/23/2006 11:45:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

$50,000 price drop:
MLS 2214567
38 Lum Ave, Chatham
$749,999 => $699,000
Days on Market: 93

3/23/2006 12:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We couldn't keep up with the payments," she explained one dreary, wet Sunday morning in late winter. "The payments went from $1,700 a month almost to $3,000 a month, so this being my first home, my dream home, I had to lose it."

How can this be when ARMs have rate caps of about 2%? Also, do interest only loans have rate caps?

I'm confused

Tony

3/23/2006 12:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

$40,000 price drop:
MLS 2233189
90 Woodland Rd, Chatham
$589,000 => $549,000
Days on Market: 77

3/23/2006 12:29:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Are the Chatham homes New World, Old World, or Third World charm?

Steve

3/23/2006 12:32:00 PM  
Blogger Richard said...

mark my words, the Fed will raise to at least 5.5%. that means 3 more hikes. they always overshoot.

3/23/2006 12:59:00 PM  
Blogger Richard said...

>How can this be when ARMs have rate caps of about 2%?

who said it was 2%. you can have as many variations of ARM's as permutations.

3/23/2006 12:59:00 PM  
Blogger grim said...

Tony,

Likely a Neg-AM ARM with a teaser rate.

You can't tell me you haven't noticed the signs across NJ adversiting a 1.25% rate.

What happens is the first year you only pay the 1.25%. During that time your mortgage is negative amortizing (principle is increasing by the difference in the actual payment). When the arm recast hits, you don't just go to up by 2% (or whatever the mortgage says), you go up to whatever the current rate is. For example, she might have gone from 1.25% to 5.75%. However, keep in mind that her principle amount increased over that period as well.

And that's just the first shock. Short term rates are on an upward tear. She's likely to recast upward the next year as well.

jb

3/23/2006 01:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How does new construction (sold directly from the builder and often not listed in MLS) get worked into these figures?

Also, are any stats available on the median price per sq foot v. overall median price?

3/23/2006 01:34:00 PM  
Blogger chicagofinance said...

grim:

In my opinion, when the Ten broke through 4.60% and held that level at the beginning of the month, it was significant. Everything else since that juncture is just noise.

Based on the behavior of the fixed income markets, no one has a clue what Bernanke is going to do, despite all the nice storylines than financial journalists seem to want to build into their reporting.

Consensus earlier this month was that there were two more tightenings coming. Suddenly some weakness in Month over Month numbers appeared [i.e. noise - January had warm weather, and February was a normal February]. Economists started making calls that 5% Fed Funds was not a lock.

Now, I think people might be thinking 5.25% [March, May, and June]. Whatever......

Unless we sell off through 5% on the Ten and hold that level, it should NOT be considered a factor on the margin. Meaning - someone with an ARM whose rate is expiring won't be unduly injured - people with option-ARMs, I/O and other assorted detritus are dead in the water regardless of whether the Ten is at 4.50%, 5% or 6%.

chicago

3/23/2006 01:40:00 PM  
Blogger chicagofinance said...

Richard said...
mark my words, the Fed will raise to at least 5.5%. that means 3 more hikes. they always overshoot.

Richard:

The idea about the Fed is that they could have overshot already with the rate at 4.5%. We won't know for several months.

chicago

3/23/2006 01:45:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Chicago or Grim,

I'm only vaguely familiar with the bond markets and how rates on Treasury notes affect lending rates. Could either of you point me to a "Bonds for Dummies" site or maybe take a crack at explaining the correlation across the two types of debt.

JM

3/23/2006 02:19:00 PM  
Blogger skep-tic said...

sales volume was shockingly high last month. higher than 2005-- insane.

could this be the last gasp of buyers trying to get in while mortgage rates are still low?

3/23/2006 02:28:00 PM  
Blogger grim said...

Rolling boom, last gasp.

I don't know where the strength in the Northeast came from, but it surely wasn't from North Jersey.

Otteau numbers for February will be out at the end of next week. I don't expect to see the NJ Association of Realtors Q1 numbers until well into May.

3/23/2006 02:52:00 PM  
Blogger skep-tic said...

rolling boom-- as in most of the sales were in places like upstate NY, VT, NH, ME?

wouldn't surprise me. there was an article in the NYTimes this week about boomers cashing out of Westchester and moving to places like ME.

3/23/2006 03:06:00 PM  
Blogger Richard said...

chicago, i'm calling 5.5%. i see hikes of 25bps in march and may, a pause in june then another 25bps hike in aug. you and i will still be hanging around grim's place so let's see what happens. any predictions from you?

3/23/2006 03:41:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Has anyone noticed a lack of FSBO's lately?

3/23/2006 04:06:00 PM  
Blogger Richard said...

if a would be seller had a half a brain they would get out now. going forward there's far more risk on the downside to get greedy and eke out a few more %

3/23/2006 04:14:00 PM  
Blogger grim said...

I've seen a number of Foxtons listings lately. Or, it might just be that I've been looking for them and ignoring others.

Unfortunately those numbers aren't easily available and it's difficult to rely on anecdotal evidence.

jb

3/23/2006 04:29:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Skeptic,

Would you please let us have a link to the article in the new york times about boomers in New York cashing out?
Thanks.

3/23/2006 04:41:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Grim-

something is wrong with your chart.. maybe you need two axes..

For example, you show northeast home sales going over 100000. They only went to 870000 in april. They are at 850000 now.

The national number is also messed up- they never went to 7.5 anything.. you show 750000, but those numbers should be in the millions and they never went over 6.28 mil.

3/23/2006 05:55:00 PM  
Blogger grim said...

No my anonymous friend. You are just looking at a different set of numbers than I plotted.

The graph displays the unadjusted monthly figures. The figures that you mention are the seasonally adjusted and annualized numbers.

I'm not a fan of adjusted and annualized numbers

grim

3/23/2006 06:21:00 PM  
Blogger skep-tic said...

here's the link to that article

"Tempted to Cash Out, Some Homeowners Get Itchy Feet"

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/19/nyregion/nyregionspecial2/19WEDECIDE.html?_r=1&n=Top%2fClassifieds%2fReal%20Estate%2fLocations%2fNew%20York%2fWestchester&oref=slogin

no hard stats. mostly fluff, but interesting that the issue's being covered.

3/23/2006 11:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Northeast may have set a record in part because of one $25,000,000.00 sale for a SFR in Edgartown, MA.

3/24/2006 09:00:00 AM  
Anonymous Rick J said...

I have been following a site now for almost 2 years and I have found it to be both reliable and profitable. They post daily and their stock trades have been beating
the indexes easily.

Take a look at Wallstreetwinnersonline.com

RickJ

4/18/2006 09:31:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home