1 In Every 893 New Jersey Households Is In Foreclosure
From RealtyTrac:
Foreclosures Up 63 Percent From March 2005
Realtytrac, leading online marketplace for foreclosure properties, today released its March 2006 U.S. Foreclosure Market Report, which shows 101,597 properties nationwide entered some stage of foreclosure in March, a 13 percent decrease from the previous month but a 63 percent increase from March 2005. The report shows a March national foreclosure rate of one new foreclosure for every 1,138 U.S. households.
"After rising more than 20 percent during each of the first two months of the year, foreclosure numbers experienced a fairly sharp correction in March," said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. "We saw a similar drop in March of '05, followed by four consecutive months of increases. Many buyers and investors typically start looking for properties in the spring, and that could have provided distressed homeowners a better chance of selling their properties to avoid default or foreclosure."
New Jersey March Foreclosure Statistics
Notice of Default 3,009
Notice to Sell 467
REO 232
Caveat Emptor!
Grim
Foreclosures Up 63 Percent From March 2005
Realtytrac, leading online marketplace for foreclosure properties, today released its March 2006 U.S. Foreclosure Market Report, which shows 101,597 properties nationwide entered some stage of foreclosure in March, a 13 percent decrease from the previous month but a 63 percent increase from March 2005. The report shows a March national foreclosure rate of one new foreclosure for every 1,138 U.S. households.
"After rising more than 20 percent during each of the first two months of the year, foreclosure numbers experienced a fairly sharp correction in March," said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. "We saw a similar drop in March of '05, followed by four consecutive months of increases. Many buyers and investors typically start looking for properties in the spring, and that could have provided distressed homeowners a better chance of selling their properties to avoid default or foreclosure."
New Jersey March Foreclosure Statistics
Notice of Default 3,009
Notice to Sell 467
REO 232
Caveat Emptor!
Grim
16 Comments:
What is that like 0.10%?
m reynolds
I can believe this statistic. I posted a snapshot of the NOD's for Essex County this morning and I've been seeing slow and steady rise in NOD's alright.
Foreclosure Investing - A Look At Essex County
Regards,
Tom
"What is that like 0.10%?"
That's one way to look at it, another way is in a town of 10,000 homes, at any given moment 11 are in foreclosure.
If that town has 100 homes on the market, 10% of them are in foreclosure.
Yes But this is ONLY the beginning.
Lots of sleepless nights as ARMs are readjusted up and the property tax bills come in.
Grim,
Would you be able to find the selling price for MLS# 2238535?
was bought in 2004 for 410K, now listed for 600K
thanks and great job putting all the info together
for 2238535, you should bid for 280K-.
Time to wake up the greedy.
I think 280 is pushing it. I wouldn't offer that much, after all it is in East Paterson....I mean Elmwood Park.
Grim,
Would you be able to find the selling price for MLS# 2238535?
must close b4 u can find ot selling price
KL
Some very intering postings from the Yahoo investor forum for builder KB Homes:
Echos of 1990?
by: PBernhardt (M/Albany, CA)
Long-Term Sentiment: Strong Sell
04/17/06 09:34 am
I'm the former RTC REO Marketing Analyst, but prefer to be Anonymous because I know some people are going to become very alarmed and very angry when I discuss what happened the last time.
When I left the RTC at HomeFed Bank in 1991, the RTC was in the process of closing down. It was the tail end of that cycle.
While at the RTC, I personally sold bank REO for 20%-30% of what it appraised for just two and three years earlier. Not for 20-30% less, but 20-30% of that real estate's former value from just 2-3 years earlier.
Mortgage defaults and bank REO are increasing rapidly already as of today. Keep in mind that banking regulators will never give lenders leeway to play the market so to speak, or hold on to REO in the hope of an improving market to get a better price or to cover their nut (i.e., mortgage). They HAVE to get those non-performing assets OFF their books. I have lots of stories about those days and I'm convinced this time it will be far worse because back then we didn't have any of the Geo-Political crises we have now (rampant illegal immigration, wars, we're a bigger debtor nation, we have a bigger trade imbalance with China than we ever had with Japan I'm sure, etc., etc.), interest rates that were artificially depressed to levels not seen in 40 years, dangerous and irresponsible lending products, and because the advent of the internet now facilitates the free flow of information much faster. Look at all the housing bubble blogs there are with all the reliable data they are providing. It's almost an avalanche of data supporting why all but the most ill-informed should not be looking to buy for at least 2 years.
I remember telling people in 1989-1990 that the writing was on the wall and nobody listened because there was no publicly available data (brokers like me knew based on MLS data only available to members) to cite in support of the impending crash, and the media, especially newspapers, weren't going to report it because their largest advertising constituency is Realtors/brokers.
With the internet and the info that is available on it, you'll soon see the amount of time it takes for real estate to crash significantly compacted this time. Just look how fast things have turned bad since just before the holiday season started last year.
Homeowners are now increasingly starting to put their homes up for sale to get an early start on the summer home buying season, and some are just now realizing how inventories on their local MLS's have tripled, quadrupled and worse. As of today, ZipRealty reports that San Diego is just about 4 weeks away (based on the average daily increase in inventory I have been monitoring since late last summer) from breaking the old record of 19,250 during the last down cycle.
I know some have said that you can't use that figure because San Diego has a larger population today, but I disagree and here's why. There are far more FSBO related companies today than 15 years ago because of the Internet and collectively, many of their their thousands of listings are not included in the ZipRealty figures. Also keep in mind that last year population in the County went down, and don't be surprised when it goes down again after this year finishes up.
Look how the tone of articles from mainstream media in the last 2 months alone have changed. Panic has already set in for many, but they have no idea how ugly it will get.
Echos of 1990? ptII
by: PBernhardt (M/Albany, CA)
Long-Term Sentiment: Strong Sell
04/17/06 09:35 am
The one thing I'm always amazed to find out is how many borrowers think that when their home goes back to the bank, that's the end of their problems. What they don't realize is that if the lender writes off or forgives any debt to them (i.e., short sale, etc.) the former borrower will get a 1099 for the amount of that forgiven debt as though they had received it as income. If they sold their home through a short sale at the begining of the year and they got a 1099 by January 30th of the following year, they not only have to pay taxes on that forgiven debt, but now penalties and interest too, because it was due (unless you pay estimated quarterly taxes) at the time the debt was forgiven. I personally knew a borrower who had 11 rental properties and after he lost the first one to foreclosure, he got hit with a huge IRS penalty. He started selling off the others, but had huge tax hits because of depreciation recapture, and because the market was getting worse, he could not sell some for what he owed. I was an underwriter at the time and on paper, just prior to losing his first property he had equity of over $1,000,000; but in the end he lost it all because he couldn't sell in a market where bank REO dominated, and when he tried, the tax hit from depreciation recapture buried him further.
The same sheeple psychology that drove everyone to ignore cash flow fundamentals by flipping condos and homes based on the greater fool theory, will invert like it did in 1990, and for the next few years you'll hear nothing about real estate except how terrible of an investment it is, and it will be true for those who either bought with high leverage or refinanced with max cash out based on the value of their homes in the last 2 years.
And anyone who says rents will catch up to all the adjusting I.O. and ARM loans is in fantasy land.
Between 1990 & 1994, I had my landlord reduce my rent three times by simply giving notice that I could rent a better condo at the beach for less. And you know why that's possible? Because of all the bank REO that was (and will be again) unloaded on the market. Owners who buy REO can easily compete on price alone. Market rent is meaningless to them. I rent a $750K place now and have been renting since we sold our residence in 2002 and our rent is under $2,000 and in the 5 years we'll have been here, the rent will have only increased by 3% from 2002 through 2007.
To those who ask how long to wait and how low will it get, here's my answer. Even though the Internet will compact the time it takes to crash, I still say don't even think about buying for at least another 18 months. Don't be fooled by ocassional news or market conditions that lead you to think things have turned better because that always happens on the way down, just as it does with stocks on companies you know are "Dead Man Walking".
As far as the percentage, don't think in terms of what percentage it will go down relative to the overall market, but what discount you can get on hardship situations, like bank REO. I think you will be able to get property for 20-30% of what it appraised for in 2005. Trust me. Even if you don't for whatever reason, others who are diligent will.
In 1995, my wife and I bought a La Jolla 1-BR condo one block to WindanSea beach with a peek ocean view off the balcony. It was in default and we bought it for a total price of $104,000 AND got the broker to kick in half his commission. That's how bad it was last time : )
http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/rubino/2006/0418.html
I ask almost every developer and contractor I come across to tell me about what happened in the late 80's and early 90's.
Here is a comment I got from a builder the other day, it went something like:
"It was nothing like today. Sure, there was building going on everywhere, but people could still afford to buy. Homes and land started to get really expensive, but you could still buy something. Today? I don't know who can afford it today."
Caveat Emptor!
grim
We will be seeing many foreclosures in "prestigious" Bergen County. How can people continue to pay their ARMs, high property taxes and Escalade leases??
No areas or income levels are really immune.
There were plenty of $750,000+ defaults in Bergen between January and today.
Englewood Cliffs $835,000
Westwood $1,626,000
Tenafly $2,000,000
Paramus $1,290,800
Saddle River $770,000
Paramus $790,00
Tenafly $992,000
How about these defaults in Alpine?
10/05 - $2,310,000
10/05 - $2,400,000
07/05 - $5,655,000
(Purchased 12/04 for $9m)
grim
HOUSING BUST!
Ba ba ba ba BOYCOTT Houses....
Bob
...which is why I am not buying a house right now. It will be interesting to see where things will be in a year
I have been following a site now for almost 2 years and I have found it to be both reliable and profitable. They post daily and their stock trades have been beating
the indexes easily.
Take a look at Wallstreetwinnersonline.com
RickJ
Find the best information online about offshore bank account at BankingServices.ca
Post a Comment
<< Home