Monday, January 09, 2006

Call For Topics & Open Discussion

A number of regular readers here suggested an open discussion forum and it does make sense, so here is how I propose to do it.

Each Monday morning I'll open a new open discussion and topics thread. We can use that for any general discussion (on topic or not) as well as any questions from readers. I'll keep that topic open for the week, and close it when the next thread is opened.

I receive quite a bit of email each week, some of them actually pose very interesting scenarios. Feel free to continue to email if you wish, but I ask that if you don't mind posting up your question or scenario, please do so even if you do it anonymously.

If anyone has any ideas for a new topic or some new aspect of North Jersey real estate they would like me to explore, please reply with your ideas.

Let the free-for-all begin!
Grim

20 Comments:

Blogger grim said...

Politics Taints Highlands Act

The scandals of the McGreevey administration continue to cloud the public's perception of the Highlands Act as some residents within the preservation area say it's an example of dirty Garden State politics.

"New Jersey politics reek of communism," Linda Ricker, a mother of three from Lebanon, Warren County, said at a Highlands Commission public meeting last week. "The government controls what you do. Are there any answers? Do you care?"

The Highlands Act mandates that 730,000 acres spread almost evenly across seven counties be preserved and that the state control growth within the region. The law seeks to redirect development to certain areas with the purpose of protecting streams and aquifers that provide 65 percent of the state's water supply.

Considered a well-intentioned law by lawmakers, some within the area, which includes 10 municipalities in Sussex County, are angry that property values of their farmland have plummeted and they no longer have the same controls over their assets.

"I could've sold my property but my land was my safety net for my future," said Ed Klopp, who owns 150 acres in Tewksberry, Hunterdon County. "We don't know what's going to happen."


...

"This is the way for Democratic legislators and a Democratic governor to punish the Republican area," John Kelsey, of Independence, Warren County, said. "The political bosses pushed it through so they could get land for dirt cheap ... and then they will sell it to developers at a profit."

"This has the potential to be the biggest graft bill ever passed in New Jersey. I hope the U.S. attorney is watching," he added.


...

Vetrano said incoming Gov. Jon Corzine, who will be inaugurated Jan. 17, needs to make the Highlands Act among his highest priorities, alongside the nearly bankrupt state Transportation Trust Fund and Schools Construction Corp.

Corzine said through a spokesman that his transition team is reviewing a number of issues, including the Highlands Act. The spokesman, Brendan Gillfillian, said Corzine has been a vocal advocate of environmental issues in the U.S. Senate and plans to continue that stance as governor.


...

At issue, Vetrano said, is whether the state will be able to afford paying affected landowners fair-market value, by which he means what their lands were worth before the Highlands Act became law. Highlands Commission Executive Director Adam Zellner said negotiations between the state and landowners will take into account land values before and after the act became law.

But that doesn't allay the fears of people who expected more value for the land they've tended for decades.

"Pay me real estate value for my land and I'll go away," Klopp said. "Our property values have been stolen."

"If I was in their shoes, I think I'd feel the same way," Vetrano said. He said the Legislature needs to appropriate enough money to adequately reimburse landowners.


My prediction? You'll see the Highlands Act overturned in the future paving the way for the development of huge tracts of northwestern NJ land. What do you think? How would you feel if you owned that 150 acres of land in Tewksbury and the NJ politicians came in and told you that the land was no longer allowed to be developed (effectively destroying the value)?

Caveat Emptor!
Grim

1/09/2006 10:07:00 AM  
Blogger grim said...

North Jersey inventory jumped rather dramatically over the weekend.

GSMLS is looking at a 1.75% jump in under 7 days. Looking at activity from 1/1 to 1/9 we had 984 homes added as new and 134 homes back on market. Those figures are from the usual list of counties that I define as Northern NJ. And yes, take a good look at those numbers, over 1000 homes added to the market in 9 days.

NJMLS and Hudson are both showing greater than 1% increases over the same time period.

Unfortunately, it's going to take a few weeks to get a true read on the trend we're seeing. But at first glance the trend seems very strong.

-Grim

1/09/2006 10:34:00 AM  
Blogger grim said...

Shanghai Housing Bubble Pops

Once one of the hottest markets in the world, sales of homes have virtually halted in some areas of Shanghai, prompting developers to slash prices and real estate brokerages to shutter thousands of offices.

For the first time, homeowners here are learning what it means to have an upside-down mortgage — when the value of a home falls below the amount of debt on the property. Recent home buyers are suing to get their money back. Banks are fretting about a wave of default loans.

"The entire industry is scaling back," said Mu Wijie, a regional manager at Century 21 China, who estimated that 3,000 brokerage offices had closed since spring. Real estate agents, whose phones wouldn't stop ringing a year ago, say their incomes have plunged by two-thirds.


...

Internet chat rooms recently were abuzz with a story that a Taiwanese man had jumped from the 33rd floor of an apartment tower about 15 miles northeast of downtown. Many people suspect that he killed himself because he was drowning in debt after his home investments went sour.

-Grim

1/09/2006 11:14:00 AM  
Blogger chicagofinance said...

I'd love to see a standing quote log.

1 Person

2 Brief Description of who they are.

3 Sequential quotes and dates

I'm sure Lereah's log would be hysterical.

It would be great to have this resource, because it is an excellent way to understand the CONTEXT of a quote.

You see a quote from a doom-gloom bear for the last 3 years, and they say "we see some sellers closing at a loss". So what?

You see a quote from a raging bull for the last 3 years, and they say "we see some sellers closing at a loss". OMFG!

1/09/2006 01:29:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

landgrab

www.njactb.org can be helpful for finding sale price info. Just click on records search and you'll be brought to a site where you can search county records. The advanced search and the excel file are the best choices for obtaining sale prices. Hope this is helpful

1/09/2006 01:48:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Landgrab
In regard to the njactb.org site-I should also add that you don't need lot and block info to get results. Usually just county, town and address is enough.

1/09/2006 02:02:00 PM  
Blogger Bear View said...

Grim,

Nice Blog. Have been following it for a couple of weeks but posting for the first time.

Some food for thought for everyone.

I like all would probably make 20%downpayment and take a 30 yr fixed if i were to buy a home. If all of us agree that 2007 or 2008 may mean higher mortgage rates then here are some numbers that may matter . This is interest paid on mortgage loans over 5 yrs and 30 yrs period at various interest points for a 550 K home and a 450k home.

550k 5yrs 30 yrs
6% 127721 509688
7% 149819 613839
8% 172021 722283

450k
6% 104499 417017
7% 122579 502232
8% 140745 590959

for 30 yrs
As you can see for a 100K drop in price if you end up waiting and the rate goes up by 1% (6 to 7) you are fine but if you wait till it is 8% you are giving back all those 100K gains in extra interest.

So if you plan to own for life i.e 30yrs min keep a eye on both Price and Interest rates.

If You plan to own for less than 30 Yrs say 5 yrs like myself at 8% you probably will end up paying 13k extra which justfies only a part of the extra price and it is well worth the wait to see if the price drops just so that other costs linked to price may come down. For a period between 5 and 30 some such amount will justify a part of the higher cost and you probably need to make a call as to what suites you.
Of course rent vs own is a totally different calculation and i personally would rent even if the price drops by 100k given that even at that price point i need about 37% appreciation over 5 years just to break even.

Here is my calc on that and the assumptions

450K home 7% 30 yrs fixed 20% down and 9000 Property tax 28% tax bracket

5yrs
Own
Down Payment $90,000
Closing Costs $8,000
Total Interest 122,579
Total Property Tax 45,000
Total Maint 12,000
Insurance 6,000
Tax Break -32922.13749

Total Cost 250,657
Selling cost 32400

Loan balance 339,290


Break even 622,347

Appre 38.29923288

1/09/2006 02:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow. Thanks for calculations.
It really is that bad now.

1/09/2006 02:26:00 PM  
Blogger Metroplexual said...

grim,

Do you have data for each municipality ?
I can map stuff if you would like. and I would like to contribuute more to the blog. I can map by municipality or county.

1/09/2006 03:16:00 PM  
Blogger Metroplexual said...

BTW,

grim I was involved in the delineations of the boundaries of the Highland Preservation Area. It was a very sad thing that happened to those landowners.

The article has some errors in it. A 150 acre parcel can be developed for residential use. (only existing commercial will be allowed) Second they some counties wrong. third it is not evenly spread. It hits some counties more than others. Sussex got barely dented (most of it was preserved already).

Will it be repealed, I don't think so. Many republicans supported it and the large number of residents in the state get their water from it. Btw much of it is undevelopable (steep slopes and wetlands)and if it were developed it would have to be sewered. Besides it runs counter to the State Plan which seeks to encourage redevelopment.

The main thing that could undermine it is the scientific basis for the rules. Warren and Hunterdon are paying for a study that will examine the scince of it. Also the star ledger a few months back did an analysis showing where the prelgislation boundaries were and after and noticed a pattern of where big development projects were and how the legislated booudaries went around them. Agian the scince is the lynch pin highlands rules dictate lot sizes that will be allowed which trumps local zoning. It was 88 acres for a >50% forested lot and when everyone asked where they got the number they couldn't say but they instead changed it to 56.5 acres which was halfway between 88 and the 25 acres as a compromise. In other words it is arbitrary. However, it might be that high to compensate for the number of lots that are already there.

Is it good planning? Yes. Is it a taking you bet! I have seen no mechanism to compensate these people, wich may also be its undoing.

1/09/2006 03:38:00 PM  
Blogger grim said...

Don't forget about gold either!

Gold hit 550 an ounce as well, I believe that makes it somewhere near a 25 year high.

1/09/2006 03:55:00 PM  
Blogger xSparta said...

landgrab said: I'm down with projections on WHEN to buy. As I've stated, I'm thinking Aug 06, but Grim has advised to wait longer. (The girlfriend, having seen this site, is buying into it).
I'm thinking that when the floodgates open and the savvy buyers starting gobbling up places, buyers will notice, and start jacking up prices again.


Like I have seen in many Real Estate Blogs their could be a "Dead Cat Bounce" this year. Perhaps a few. Remember when the NASDAC was crashing?? Some investors thought it was was a "Bargin" when it fell 1000 points! I almost bought LUCENT when it fell to $50 a share...........real bargin!

1/09/2006 04:16:00 PM  
Blogger chicagofinance said...

bearview:

Interesting.

Please allow me to add one comment on your calculations.

There is not a clear negative correlation that can be extrapolated between interest rates and real estate prices.

We have seen the current market weakness in the face of a rise in short-term interest rates and a rally in long-term fixed income.

I would posit that if we had a move from 6.25% for 30Y-fixed to 8%, then resulting damage would be so catastrophic that your comparison would not even be necessary.

In plain language:
The market is holding together now; the Wall Street bonus money cavalry is on the way; but if we have a spike in interest rates on the long end of the curve, we would have a real estate bear market for the history books.

I don't really think it will get so bad.

1/09/2006 04:29:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'd like to see regular posts on number of listings.

I'd also like to see some price tracking to follow the condo/townhouse market separate from the SFH market on the basis that it has attracted more speculators and will be one of the first areas to drop...


FYI The Brunswicks area was overloaded with open houses over the weekend.

1/09/2006 05:44:00 PM  
Blogger chicagofinance said...

In towns that are mostly SFH and have very few rentals, the rent/owner calculation can be closer. In towns where there are many rentals, the market tends to be more competitive.

That said, are they properly considering the actual costs?

Rent

versus

Mortgage Payment + Real Estate Taxes + all other taxes + cost off maint/upkeep + homeowner's insurance + interest lost on down payment (because you can invest this money) - tax savings on mortgage interest (remember ONLY the incremental amount above your standard deduction) + lost time mowing the lawn + whatever else I forgot :)

1/09/2006 07:46:00 PM  
Blogger chicagofinance said...

Pascack:

Quick question that is completely off-topic (I apologize). Complete coincidence, I was researching the financial condition of the Pascack Valley Hospital in Westwood. The last information I saw was from last February's Bergen Record. My firm hold muni-bonds from the NJHCF that are tied to Pascack. Were we thinking about dumping all of our positions because S&P downgraded them to junk in 2004 and they deteriorated to mid-B range now. These puppies are shortdated, so we will probably hold for now. Do you know of a good source for local information? All of the disclosures connected to the hosipital are purposely vague, and the last S&P pronouncement is 18 months old.

Sorry about this complete off-topic. E-mail me through the website if you wish.

1/10/2006 10:20:00 AM  
Blogger chicagofinance said...

Grim:

Is there any way to get data on cross holders of real estate in NJ and other geographic areas?

As an example, is it possible that a NJ resident has a second (or third) home in Florida, and when that market collapses in a pile of dust, it could suck some of the life out of the market here by association.

As an example, we've seen evidence of owners in CA buying property in TX, AZ, NV etc.

Any thoughts on this?

chicago

1/10/2006 02:26:00 PM  
Blogger grim said...

CF,

Not that I know of, although I agree that the data would provide significant insight into speculative activity..

Exposure to the risk you bring up is more likely to be felt by the lenders and MBS-holders. The only way to mitigate that risk is through higher risk premiums and thus, higher mortgage rates. So, a large scale regional crash would most certainly feed back via mortgage rate spikes nationwide.

The impact would be much larger than that of individual investors.

However, anecdotal stories of loss have a knack for shifting psychology.

grim

1/10/2006 03:50:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

check this out.
http://realtytimes.com/rtmcrloc/New_Jersey~Montgomery_Township

1/10/2006 09:40:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have been following a site now for almost 2 years and I have found it to be both reliable and profitable. They post daily and their stock trades have been beating
the indexes easily.

Take a look at Wallstreetwinnersonline.com

RickJ

5/18/2006 05:49:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home